The current version allows free pipe operator %>>% to pipe object to a naked function name, which makes valid to use both %>% and %>>% to work with naked function name.
However, this makes the two symbol interchangeable in this case, which should not be considered useful. To keep the features of each symbol simple and clear, this feature should be removed in the next version.
renkun-ken
commented
10 years ago
The current version allows free pipe operator
%>>%to pipe object to a naked function name, which makes valid to use both%>%and%>>%to work with naked function name.However, this makes the two symbol interchangeable in this case, which should not be considered useful. To keep the features of each symbol simple and clear, this feature should be removed in the next version.