Separate person & household evidence generation

[katbusch]

@kaelgreco can you run this on your join in your notebook and make sure the output makes sense?

---

This change is 

[kaelgreco]

Yes, this worked!

small nit if relevant below

---

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1. Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

doppelganger/populationgen.py, line 47 at r1 (raw file):

    @staticmethod
    def _extract_households_evidence(allocated_rows, fields, segmenter, _):

super tiny nit: symmetry in naming, e.g. _extract_person_evidence and _extract_household_evidence (vs. plural). or is that a meaningful distinction?

---

Comments from Reviewable

[katbusch]

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.

---

doppelganger/populationgen.py, line 47 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, kaelgreco wrote…

super tiny nit: symmetry in naming, e.g. `_extract_person_evidence` and `_extract_household_evidence` (vs. plural). or is that a meaningful distinction?

Done.

---

Comments from Reviewable