Open mnp opened 1 year ago
Thanks for raising this!
The next step is to spin up a test Kind cluster and have a look to see how it's identified. The Distribution identifier in Troubleshoot has a few different things it checks, because different types of cluster have different ways to identify themselves.
Is this something you envisage seeing in development environments only, or in production usage?
Low-ish prio for us. We are just using Kind for dev and CI at the moment (happy to share our GH action goop), but we are thinking there might eventually be a customer use here for small/edge prod environments. It's lazy/convenient since it runs inside a container so the host requirements are mostly moot.
Yeah I had a look at analyze/distribution.go
to see what could be keyed off. There is no dumptruck of labels as some other distros provide (cough) but there are some images running: grep the describe-node.json attachment for kindest
. Another difference that jumps out is the default SC is rancher.io/local-path
but that might be a red herring overlapping with actual Rancher.
I've also attached a stock support bundle.
Describe the rationale for the suggested feature.
The analyzer should recognize Kind cluster type and report a new
Distribution
identifier.Describe the feature
Kind it's an official SIG, Replicated/Helm work fine on it, and it has uses in dev, CI and test at least. We are considering customer use cases also. See
Describe alternatives you've considered
{{repl Distribution}}
turns up "" on Kind. We can sometimes hack around this.Additional context
Thanks for reading.