as-of is using timepoints as transaction IDs or transaction IDs. In Datomic you can also use a point in time given by the database as described in the datomic ref.
What is the expected behaviour?
Integers that represent the transaction index should also work.
What version of Datahike are you using?
0.5.1515
What version of Java are you using?
openjdk version "19" 2022-09-20
What operating system are you using?
macos ventura 13.0
What database EDN configuration are you using?
Describe the bug
as-of
is using timepoints as transaction IDs or transaction IDs. In Datomic you can also use a point in time given by the database as described in the datomic ref.What is the expected behaviour?
Integers that represent the transaction index should also work.
How can the behaviour be reproduced?