search

repology / repology-rules

Package normalization ruleset for Repology
https://repology.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
113 stars 128 forks source link

burpsuite: stable vs early adopter #490

Closed blshkv closed 3 years ago

blshkv commented 3 years ago

There are two lines of burpsuite: https://portswigger.net/burp/releases The stable version should be 2021.5.x, I marked 2021.6.x as _pre

it is difficult to differentiate between two because the jar file doesn't reflect it. So I'm not sure what can be done, what's your take? Contact vendor?

AMDmi3 commented 3 years ago

So I'm not sure what can be done, what's your take? Contact vendor?

Would be nice. On repology side, I'm marking 2021.6 as devel, but it would have to be updated as soon as 2021.6 is considered stable. _pre suffix is fake and would make 2021.6.1_pre compare less than official 2021.6.1.

blshkv commented 3 years ago

https://forum.portswigger.net/thread/differentiate-burp-releases-19ecf9bf

blshkv commented 3 years ago

so the upstream said "this isn't something we can do at this time". Can you mark it as release-candidate perhaps? _rc suffix?

AMDmi3 commented 3 years ago

2021.6 is already classified as devel. What else needs to be done and why?

blshkv commented 3 years ago

I was asking if you would consider marking our _rc ebuilds as devel?

Also, 2021.6.2 is stable now, see https://portswigger.net/burp/releases/professional-community-2021-6-2

AMDmi3 commented 3 years ago

I was asking if you would consider marking our _rc ebuilds as devel?

rcs are devel by default. But they will compare less than suffixless versions, thus be classified as outdated.

Also, 2021.6.2 is stable now, see https://portswigger.net/burp/releases/professional-community-2021-6-2

I expect pull requests for projects which require continuous rule updates.