Closed livioc closed 6 months ago
Looks good, I like it.
@livioc Could you please include into the docs that the @priority:
tag is only processed this way if there was a number provided after the :
.
I think is is also important to mention because for anyone already had a @priority:high
tag (it's quite common), there will be no breaking change (I mean no error of invalid priority format).
@gasparnagy I have pushed an updated version of the documentation
Thx!
@livioc Would you be interested to also implement the [DataRow]
attribute support as well? For xUnit and NUnit, SpecFlow (by default) generates a single parametrized test for scenario outlines and adds the examples as data rows. But for MsTest this was not implemented yet. (We should always keep the option to generate multiple methods, like we do for NUnit & xUnit.)
Thx!
@livioc Would you be interested to also implement the
[DataRow]
attribute support as well? For xUnit and NUnit, SpecFlow (by default) generates a single parametrized test for scenario outlines and adds the examples as data rows. But for MsTest this was not implemented yet. (We should always keep the option to generate multiple methods, like we do for NUnit & xUnit.)
@gasparnagy yes, I can work on it in the next weeks
This pr adds the support for PriorityAttribute of the MsTest framework
Types of changes
Checklist: