Closed maoso closed 4 months ago
It is actually a feature. As referred to documentation:
Reqnroll uses a JSON configuration file named reqnroll.json, but it is also compatible with the specflow.json configuration files.
Yes, as @konarx said it is by design for now. I'm closing the issue, but if you see anything with this approach that causes a problem, please reopen.
Reqnroll Version
1.0.1
Which test runner are you using?
NUnit
Test Runner Version Number
4.5.0
.NET Implementation
.NET 6.0
Test Execution Method
Visual Studio Test Explorer
Content of reqnroll.json configuration file
No response
Issue Description
I am testing Reqnroll migration and when running it on Visual Studio 2022 I can see into the ReqnRoll output that still makes reference to specflow.json file.
So it calls to the command dotnet.exe exec < path to reqnroll-vs.dll > discovery < dll path > < path to specflow.json >
I think it shouldn't make reference to specflow.json probably should be reqnroll.json
Steps to Reproduce
I am testing Reqnroll migration and when running it on Visual Studio 2022 I can see into the ReqnRoll output that still makes reference to specflow.json file.
So it calls to the command dotnet.exe exec < path to reqnroll-vs.dll > discovery < dll path > < path to specflow.json >
I think it shouldn't make reference to specflow.json probably should be reqnroll.json
Link to Repro Project
No response