Closed JonathanHuot closed 2 years ago
Hi @nateprewitt , can you go to https://app.travis-ci.com/organizations/requests/repositories and enable Travis CI App for requests-oauthlib please ? It is required to restore TravisCI since the migration from org to com. Note that mid/long term, a migration to GH Actions can be done.
Hi @nateprewitt again, we also need to add coveralls repository, perhaps here https://coveralls.io/repos/new . I have requested access from requests community, but I'm not sure it is the right way.. wondering how it was working before. Any comments will be much appreciated. Thanks
Hi @JonathanHuot ,
I've authorized Travis CI although it's prompting for CC information to use their free trial. It appears it may be working, but if not, we'll need to look into moving to Github Actions sooner than later.
In regards to Coveralls, I checked the repo and it says it's already activated. It shows as approved at the org level as well. If it's not working currently, adding codecov with Github actions is relatively straight forward with actions as well.
- name: Upload Coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v2
with:
fail_ci_if_error: true
name: "${{ runner.os }} (${{ matrix.python-version }})"
files: ./coverage.xml
verbose: true
Should we close this PR without merging? Since it sounds like we're moving to Github actions due to the potential barriers in place with Travis?
Closed in favor of https://github.com/requests/requests-oauthlib/pull/470
TODO list: