Open stefanv opened 1 year ago
You probably remember - we discussed this a fair bit at the time. The problem that I saw, was that we were too early to introduce the idea of methods. rng
reads as "random number generator" and so it's obvious that rng
is a value and that rng.choice
is a function attached to a value - a method. Whereas rnd.choice
allows the student to feel that rnd
is a bit like np
- just a namespace, and that rnd.choice
is just a function in a namespace, like np.sum
.
Against that we have the Numpy default convention - but I don't think that's a very strong argument. I don't think they will be all that confused, in due course, by code with rng.choice
instead of rnd.choice
.
Right now, in some places,
rnd = np.random.default_rng()
is used.To me, it feels better to consistently use the pattern
rng = np.random.default_rng()
. This is the pattern encouraged in the NumPy docs and which is used in the library ecosystem.