resbazaz / core_mission

Documents about ResBazAZ's central mission, outlined goals, etc.
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

Brainstorm tasks/jobs/activities necessary to fulfill our mission #7

Closed julianpistorius closed 4 years ago

julianpistorius commented 5 years ago

... in order to make our vision real.

See exec meeting 2019-10-29 notes for more background.

@resbazaz/steering-committee members to indicate availability:

Special member outside the steering committee:

julianpistorius commented 4 years ago

@resbazaz/steering-committee Please mark your calendars for: Monday, 2019-11-25, 4pm

alex-r-bigelow commented 4 years ago

A test to see if the LucidChart plugin works:

https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/7bd80635-8517-468c-9693-0824ad5aa76f

kelseygonzalez commented 4 years ago

Looks fine to me!

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019, 8:43 AM Alex Bigelow notifications@github.com wrote:

A test to see if the LucidChart plugin works:

https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/view/4846edbf-f27a-4be0-ba9a-0510a21c8b05

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/resbazaz/core_mission/issues/7?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMD4F6BT4BXMK4YXI4KHLA3QVU7XDA5CNFSM4JPUUMWKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEFGOR3I#issuecomment-558688493, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMD4F6GVOPRI6VGU5CW5JW3QVU7XDANCNFSM4JPUUMWA .

alex-r-bigelow commented 4 years ago

(edited the link so that others can edit as well...)

alex-r-bigelow commented 4 years ago

Sorry for the delay (things like regular work distracted me); I made a quick-and-dirty transcription of our sticky notes + an ugly chart because Lucid apparently doesn't let you edit beyond a certain number of shapes without buying the pro version.

All of us should be able to edit the chart from github; no local cloning should necessary—but you might need to go to Developer tools -> Network -> Disable cache to see your own recent changes.

(Also, apparently I don't have privileges to delete my brainstorming-notes branch on this repo—initially I tried to make the chart a subdirectory inside this one, but my original githack idea didn't work. If anyone with privileges sees it, feel free to trash it)

julianpistorius commented 4 years ago

Thank you very much @alex-r-bigelow! 🙇

(Also, apparently I don't have privileges to delete my brainstorming-notes branch on this repo—initially I tried to make the chart a subdirectory inside this one, but my original githack idea didn't work. If anyone with privileges sees it, feel free to trash it)

I trashed it.

kelseygonzalez commented 4 years ago

Thanks @alex-r-bigelow - this is awesome!

julianpistorius commented 4 years ago

@kelseygonzalez @alex-r-bigelow @yeea What's next?

alex-r-bigelow commented 4 years ago

I think we wanted to create small overlapping teams, assigned to each of the categories?

There are nine members and eight first-tier categories (potential teams), although the communication category could probably be split into two teams. That would make the math easy: if we want teams of size n, everyone would be responsible to sign up for n teams.

My vote would be for n = 3.

yeea commented 4 years ago

I like Alex's overarching idea! I would augment it by adding that we'd talked about some teams probably needing more people/effort than others due to complexity, so we can sort of fudge into a fourth team if it suits us or we collectively think that team needs more members/another team could use less

kelseygonzalez commented 4 years ago

It really comes down to how many people we want on each "team". Basically, how many people need to be on the communication committee, the event committee, etc? Once we establish that I really like Alex's idea of spreading us around onto the different committees so that we have good coverage and then recruiting others to get more involved on these committees as well.

(You have no idea how many times I misspelled "committee" on this reponse!)