Closed julianpistorius closed 4 years ago
@resbazaz/steering-committee Please mark your calendars for: Monday, 2019-11-25, 4pm
A test to see if the LucidChart plugin works:
https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/7bd80635-8517-468c-9693-0824ad5aa76f
Looks fine to me!
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019, 8:43 AM Alex Bigelow notifications@github.com wrote:
A test to see if the LucidChart plugin works:
https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/view/4846edbf-f27a-4be0-ba9a-0510a21c8b05
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/resbazaz/core_mission/issues/7?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMD4F6BT4BXMK4YXI4KHLA3QVU7XDA5CNFSM4JPUUMWKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEFGOR3I#issuecomment-558688493, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMD4F6GVOPRI6VGU5CW5JW3QVU7XDANCNFSM4JPUUMWA .
(edited the link so that others can edit as well...)
Sorry for the delay (things like regular work distracted me); I made a quick-and-dirty transcription of our sticky notes + an ugly chart because Lucid apparently doesn't let you edit beyond a certain number of shapes without buying the pro version.
All of us should be able to edit the chart from github; no local cloning should necessary—but you might need to go to Developer tools -> Network -> Disable cache to see your own recent changes.
(Also, apparently I don't have privileges to delete my brainstorming-notes
branch on this repo—initially I tried to make the chart a subdirectory inside this one, but my original githack idea didn't work. If anyone with privileges sees it, feel free to trash it)
Thank you very much @alex-r-bigelow! 🙇
(Also, apparently I don't have privileges to delete my
brainstorming-notes
branch on this repo—initially I tried to make the chart a subdirectory inside this one, but my original githack idea didn't work. If anyone with privileges sees it, feel free to trash it)
I trashed it.
Thanks @alex-r-bigelow - this is awesome!
@kelseygonzalez @alex-r-bigelow @yeea What's next?
I think we wanted to create small overlapping teams, assigned to each of the categories?
There are nine members and eight first-tier categories (potential teams), although the communication category could probably be split into two teams. That would make the math easy: if we want teams of size n, everyone would be responsible to sign up for n teams.
My vote would be for n = 3.
I like Alex's overarching idea! I would augment it by adding that we'd talked about some teams probably needing more people/effort than others due to complexity, so we can sort of fudge into a fourth team if it suits us or we collectively think that team needs more members/another team could use less
It really comes down to how many people we want on each "team". Basically, how many people need to be on the communication committee, the event committee, etc? Once we establish that I really like Alex's idea of spreading us around onto the different committees so that we have good coverage and then recruiting others to get more involved on these committees as well.
(You have no idea how many times I misspelled "committee" on this reponse!)
... in order to make our vision real.
See exec meeting 2019-10-29 notes for more background.
@resbazaz/steering-committee members to indicate availability:
Special member outside the steering committee: