Closed minkull closed 4 years ago
The authors provided a clearly structured replication package, consisting of a large amount of data related to their study. I checked through the files and did not see any obvious mistakes. I appreciate the efforts the authors had put into this study. I am particularly impressed by the detailed records of several rounds of manual analyses of GitHub issues, PRs, and SO posts, the open coding process, and the transcriptions of the interviews.
The package not only allows the replication of the paper’s findings but also provides a good dataset of deep learning system faults for future research.
I believe the submission satisfies the criteria of “available” and “reuse”. I am happy to recommend both badges.
One suggestion to is to put the datasets on Zenodo (or similar services) and provide a DOI.
I agree that the submission satisfies the criteria of "available"and "reuse" and I am happy to recommend both badges.
I'd also like to second the suggestion of assigning a unique DOI to the dataset (e.g., via Zenodo)
Thank you very much for the provided feedback. As per your suggestion, the dataset is now published on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3667541)
@nh17937 : can you do a pull request where that DOI is in the INSTALL.d file? thanks!
@timm: sure, thank you, I have created the pull request
https://github.com/researchart/rose6icse/tree/master/submissions/available/humbatova-icse20-main-477 https://github.com/researchart/rose6icse/tree/master/submissions/reusable/humbatova-icse20-main-477
Nargiz Humbatova (nh17937) Gunel Jahangirova (guneljahan) Gabriele Bavota Vincenzo Riccio Andrea Stocco Paolo Tonella
Note to reviewers: these authors want multiple badges