Open smcgregor opened 1 year ago
These classifications inevitably have their own biases (see https://adfontesmedia.com/is-the-media-bias-chart-biased), so I think we should handle this similarly to the taxonomies. Instead of adopting "an" authority on political bias, we should support labels from multiple sources that classify publications by their political bias. This could also potentially help with coverage of non-English publications.
Some other possible sources:
Wikipedia – it has several places to look...
Info boxes – many publications have a "Political alignment" category, e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail – Right-wing, Eurosceptic Conservative
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Times – centre to centre-right
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian – Centre-left
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L’Humanité – Left-wing
Category pages, e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Libertarian_publications
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Socialist_publications
Wikidata "Political Ideology" property, applied to The Times, not many other publications.
Related: https://github.com/responsible-ai-collaborative/aiid/issues/1191
@smcgregor I think this has broader implications with how we are generally structuring tags. I'll bring it up at an Editor Stand-up meeting.
@Janetbananet sounds good. I think this one will be entirely programmatic, but with the ability for people to intervene.
Let's tag all the reports in the database according to their political bias ratings as determined by an outside authority. We don't want to be responsible for determining the bias of different publications. This would subsequently let us annotate reports on incidents in the UI according to the biases of the reporting.
Example source data: https://adfontesmedia.com/ https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
Steps