Closed agentofuser closed 5 years ago
Maybe, yeah, I think that could make sense.
It would add some more logic (dropping the lodash function, iterating over all values in ignore
, and then testing them all), and it’s not super important because it’s already possible to provide ['h1', 'h2', ...]
.
And last, did you look at providing a personal dictionary?
Yeah, I also feel weird mixing types in the same array. My use case doesn't justify the added complexity/inelegance. Also yes, personal dictionaries are great :)
Alright, thanks for the issue though, please raise more if you run into other things!
Would there be interest in a PR allowing regexps as well as strings in the
ignore
array?Example use-case: ignoring names of html headings like
/h\d/
.