Open jakejh opened 4 years ago
Hi @jakejh, absolutely! Also happy to discuss about how to integrate/test it if you want! thanks in advance.
Cool, thanks. I'll get back to you.
Hi @qgeissmann, we just realized you fixed the chi-square periodogram (https://github.com/rethomics/zeitgebr/issues/3) the same way we did! :-)
I'd suggest one of the following:
What do you think?
Oh I see!! I remember now! yes, it seemed obvious to us that the standard CPS was broken... And I had fixed it mostly based on intuition, so I am glad we are converging on that! Would you say there is any reason to keep the standard CSP? I am more inclined to just document what we have, and then reference your work in the doc?
That sounds great.
Hello, would you be interested in a PR for a new version of the chi-square periodogram?
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.14.251512