Closed ryofurue closed 1 year ago
In the case of 3X8WKDMA-refs-apse
, what would be the preprint archive? Earth and Space Science Open Archive
?
Thank you for your response.
what would be the preprint archive?
Earth and Space Science Open Archive
?
Yes. The Zotero browser plugin put it in the "Repository" field of the "Preprint" entry.
I can see that preprint can be problematic because there is no standard practice for biblatex. If you look at discussion on the Net, you see that some recommend @article
, some @online
, some @misc
. At least, it seems the names of the relevant fields are sort of standardized by biblatex for arXiv, though:
But, for other preprint services . . . I don't know.
@njbart would you reckon a preprint would be better mapped to unpublished
, or to online
?
:robot: this is your friendly neighborhood build bot announcing test build 6.7.54.3749 ("update preprint testcase")
Install in Zotero by downloading test build 6.7.54.3749, opening the Zotero "Tools" menu, selecting "Add-ons", open the gear menu in the top right, and select "Install Add-on From File...".
If this is about biblatex, the examples from https://github.com/plk/biblatex/blob/dev/bibtex/bib/biblatex/biblatex-examples.bib seem to indicate that @online
is appropriate, unless the item in question has also been officially published, in which case @article
would make more sense.
@article{baez/article,
author = {Baez, John C. and Lauda, Aaron D.},
title = {Higher-Dimensional Algebra {V}: 2-Groups},
journaltitle = {Theory and Applications of Categories},
date = 2004,
volume = 12,
pages = {423-491},
version = 3,
eprint = {math/0307200v3},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
annotation = {An \texttt{article} with \texttt{eprint} and
\texttt{eprinttype} fields. Note that the arXiv reference is
transformed into a clickable link if \texttt{hyperref} support
has been enabled. Compare \texttt{baez\slash online}, which
is the same item given as an \texttt{online} entry},
}
@online{baez/online,
author = {Baez, John C. and Lauda, Aaron D.},
title = {Higher-Dimensional Algebra {V}: 2-Groups},
date = {2004-10-27},
version = 3,
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
eprint = {math/0307200v3},
annotation = {An \texttt{online} reference from arXiv. Note the
\texttt{eprint} and \texttt{eprinttype} fields. Compare
\texttt{baez\slash article} which is the same item given as an
\texttt{article} entry with eprint information},
}
@online{itzhaki,
author = {Itzhaki, Nissan},
title = {Some remarks on {'t Hooft's} {S}-matrix for black holes},
date = {1996-03-11},
version = 1,
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
eprint = {hep-th/9603067},
annotation = {An \texttt{online} reference from arXiv. Note the
\texttt{eprint} and \texttt{eprinttype} fields. Also note that
the arXiv reference is transformed into a clickable link if
\texttt{hyperref} support has been enabled},
abstract = {We discuss the limitations of 't Hooft's proposal for the
black hole S-matrix. We find that the validity of the S-matrix
implies violation of the semi-classical approximation at
scales large compared to the Planck scale. We also show that
the effect of the centrifugal barrier on the S-matrix is
crucial even for large transverse distances.},
}
@online{wassenberg,
author = {Wassenberg, Jan and Sanders, Peter},
title = {Faster Radix Sort via Virtual Memory and Write-Combining},
date = {2010-08-17},
version = 1,
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
eprintclass = {cs.DS},
eprint = {1008.2849v1},
annotation = {A recent \texttt{online} reference from arXiv using the new
(April 2007 onward) identifier format. Note the
\texttt{eprint}, \texttt{eprinttype}, and \texttt{eprintclass}
fields. Also note that the arXiv reference is transformed into
a clickable link if \texttt{hyperref} support has been
enabled},
abstract = {Sorting algorithms are the deciding factor for the performance
of common operations such as removal of duplicates or database
sort-merge joins. This work focuses on 32-bit integer keys,
optionally paired with a 32-bit value. We present a fast radix
sorting algorithm that builds upon a microarchitecture-aware
variant of counting sort},
}
@ryofurue right now BBT will output the following for 3X8WKDMA-refs-apse
:
@online{CalilPHR:2022,
title = {High-resolution, basin-scale simulations reveal the impact of intermediate zonal jets on the {{Atlantic}} oxygen minimum zones},
author = {Calil, Paulo H. R.},
date = {2022-10-18},
eprinttype = {Earth and Space Science Open Archive},
eprintclass = {Oceanography},
doi = {10.1002/essoar.10511180.2},
url = {https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10511180.2},
urldate = {2022-10-26},
langid = {english}
}
% == BibLateX quality report for CalilPHR:2022:
% ? unused Archive location ("world")
% ? unused ISSN ("1051-1180")
% ? unused Library catalog ("www.essoar.org")
note that eprint
is missing as the Zotero entry did not have an identifier filled out. It's not reported as missing in the quality report since @online
only requires at least one of doi
/eprint
/url
to be present. It does seem weird to me to have the eprinttype
field but not the eprint
field.
Maybe if it has an ISSN and a journaltitle I should use @article
rather than @online
?
Maybe if it has an ISSN and a journaltitle I should use
@article
rather than@online
?
I don't think so . . . For the particular example I've sent you, the preprint will remain as preprint for ever. It will not be treated as a journal article. The server is not linked to a particular journal. When a preprint is published in a journal, the preprint webpage just shows a link to the published version.
I guess this preprint server has an ISSN only because its editorial board controls the quality of the preprints and administers proper curation.
right now BBT will output the following
I guess you mean you will produce another BBT test version? I'm currently using
the latest test version and it puts the entry in @misc
with type = {Preprint}
, etc.
I'll test what happens with @online
with biblatex-chicago, which I use.
I guess you mean you will produce another BBT test version? I'm currently using the latest test version and it puts the entry in
@misc
withtype = {Preprint}
, etc.
3749 outputs what I posted earlier for biblatex, and the following for bibtex:
@misc{CalilPHR:2022,
title = {High-resolution, basin-scale simulations reveal the impact of intermediate zonal jets on the {{Atlantic}} oxygen minimum zones},
author = {Calil, Paulo H. R.},
year = {2022},
month = oct,
publisher = {{Earth and Space Science Open Archive}},
doi = {10.1002/essoar.10511180.2},
chapter = {Oceanography},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License},
langid = {english}
}
I don't know how you got type = {Preprint},
, neither the BBT nor the stock bib(la)tex exports seem to produce that. Maybe the type = {Preprint},
is reasonable for bibtex? I don't know.
3749 outputs what I posted earlier for biblatex
I see! I totally forgot that I'm using "bibtex" output, not "biblatex" output. Sorry for the confusion.
I don't know how you got
type = {Preprint}
,
Again, sorry that was my mistake. I have two entries on Zotero for the same preprint: One is "Web Page" type and the other, "Preprint" type. You get type = {Preprint}
for the Web Page version.
Okay, I'll test the "biblatex" output and see how biblatex-chicago handles it.
I got
Paulo H. R. Calil. High-Resolution, Basin-Scale Simulations Reveal the Impact of Intermediate Zonal Jets on the Atlantic Oxygen Minimum Zones. Oct. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1002/essoar.10511180.2. url: https:// essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10511180.2 (visited on 10/26/2022).
from biblatex (without any package options) on the basis of the "biblatex" output from BBT. biblatex-chicago
is essentially the same.
Still there is no indication that this is a preprint or name of the repository. Perhaps I should ask the developers of biblatex and biblatex-chicago?
That's what I'd recommend. The biblatex manual doesn't say anything about preprints, so I don't what biblatex would need to signal a pre-print.
Well, short of getting biblatex or biblatex-chicago modified I'd imagine adding something like pubstate = {preprint}
would do the trick. One could also think of having this added by BBT, or by biblatex on the fly in case eprinttype
contains the name of a known preprint archive.
:robot: this is your friendly neighborhood build bot announcing test build 6.7.54.3757 ("add pubstate to preprint")
Install in Zotero by downloading test build 6.7.54.3757, opening the Zotero "Tools" menu, selecting "Add-ons", open the gear menu in the top right, and select "Install Add-on From File...".
Thank you both for your help.
With test build 6.7.54.3757, I get
Paulo H. R. Calil. High-resolution, basin-scale simulations reveal the impact of intermediate zonal jets on the Atlantic oxygen minimum zones. Oct. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1002/essoar.10511180.2. url: https:// essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10511180.2 (visited on 10/26/2022). preprint.
We do get "preprint" now.
I've submitted a request to the official biblatex git. I just asked them to make an official recommendation in the official manual about preprints. What type a preprint should be. Where the name of the preprint server should go. And so on and so forth.
I was here to ask about the mapping of the preprints. Turns out, you guys have already fixed it. I am getting @Misc for the preprints, and all the fields are correctly mapped.
This is absolutely what I hopped for. Thank you so much.
@ryofurue if you comment here the issue will automatically reopen.
Debug log ID
3X8WKDMA-refs-apse
What happened?
Currently, Zotero's Preprint field becomes
@misc
but then I miss the following two pieces of information in the reference list:I don't know what's the best entry type, but if we use
@article
withjournal = {repository name}
andnote={preprint}
then most bibliography processors will produce good references with perhaps warnings like "missing volume number" and "missing pages". This handling would be almost the same as a journal article "in press".