search

retupmoca / P6-Net-AMQP

MIT License
6 stars 4 forks source link

AMQP 1.0 #22

Open demanuel opened 3 years ago

demanuel commented 3 years ago

Hi!

Any chance of supporting AMQP 1.0 ? The AMQP working group released the 1.0 specification in the final quarter of 2011.

Best regards, David Santiago

jonathanstowe commented 3 years ago

I've thought about this a couple of times in the last few years and I'm not actually convinced that adding 1.0 support to this module would work very well: the differences in the messaging semantics between the 0.98 that RabbitMQ supports and 1.0 are sufficient that I don't think it would be easy to make a consistent interface (while retaining the existing interface of this module.)

I'd be more inclined to rename this Net::RabbitMQ (rabbitmq is likely to always support 0.98 as the default protocol because it follows the broker architecture quite closely.) and make a new Net::AMQP that might support both versions but has an interface that reflects the more limited scope of 1.0.

demanuel commented 3 years ago

I'd be more inclined to rename this Net::RabbitMQ (rabbitmq is likely to always support 0.98 as the default protocol because it follows the broker architecture quite closely.) and make a new Net::AMQP that might support both versions but has an interface that reflects the more limited scope of 1.0.

That would be fine for me. Unfortunately i have to work with apache qpid which only supports AMQP 1.0

jonathanstowe commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately i have to work with apache qpid which only supports AMQP 1.0

That was going to be my next question 😃 AFAIK qpid is the only thing that uses it as its primary (or only,) protocol: all the rest (ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, IBM MQ et al,) support it as an add-on, though in the case of IBM MQ it would be useful because the native wire protocol isn't documented and the libraries, er, show their early '70s heritage.