search

reubano / growl

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/growl
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
0 stars 0 forks source link

delegate/notification for when growl is enabled/disabled #405

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What feature or enhancement do you propose?

Send a delegate or notification in the framework when Growl is started or 
stopped, corresponding to isRunning.

What problem does it solve/What benefit does it provide?

isRunning won't have to be polled continuously to determine if Growl is running 
or not (to show/hide Mist options).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by livings...@gmail.com on 22 Dec 2011 at 1:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Why would you need to show/hide mist options, since it's simply a on/off? 
Wouldn't that also apply to Growl as well? This seems like complication to a 
simple process, which is why I'm asking.

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
If the user has Growl running, I want to hide the option to enable/disable Mist 
(since they can configure notifications in Growl.app).

Original comment by livings...@gmail.com on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I get that is what you want to do, but why would you do that instead of have a 
"enable notifications" that the user selects that handles either Mist or Growl, 
regardless of which one it is?

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I think it makes sense to enable and configure in the Growl prefs. Regardless, 
this would still be needed for showing/hiding a button to open Growl, relevant 
text, etc.

Original comment by livings...@gmail.com on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Alright, I think i get it now. Let me summarize this and confirm that this is 
what you mean.

1) You want to have some preference to enable/disable notifications in general.

2) If Growl is running, you want to present the user with a button to configure 
your application in Growl via the new URL scheme in 1.4.

3) If Growl is not running, you would likely not show a button at all to 
configure notifications in Growl.

Does this summarize what you want?

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yes. except for three I have a simple checkbox to enable or disable Mist 
notifications. I already have this working, and can determine which set of 
options to show based on the framework's isRunning method, but I have no way to 
know if they app is launched or quit to change which set of options are shown 
while running.

Original comment by livings...@gmail.com on 22 Dec 2011 at 5:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 31 Dec 2011 at 3:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 27 Aug 2012 at 1:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Closing as fixed in source, for Framework 3.0.  The new isGrowlRunning property 
on the proper singleton is observable, and can be used as a readonly binding.

Original comment by dan...@growl.info on 18 Jun 2013 at 10:11