Closed Udi-Fogiel closed 7 months ago
I extended the comment. Better for you?
I meant it wasn't documented in the user manual, should it be there?
No, this command is not meant to be used in documents. It is meant to be used in gloss files.
Ok, so not related to this ticket, but if I understand correctly, any setup is made during the processing of the .ldf files. So I have two questions:
\polyglossia@keys_define_lang:n
be global? after all, we assume that everything is done during the processing of the .ldf file and it should not happen inside a group.I'd have to check that. On a general note, I am wondering whether we shouldn't do a release with the bug fixes we have before we start a major code rewrite which always entails the risk of introducing bugs.
Sure, I'll stop with the commits for the time being.
Thanks. I try do to the release soon. Please check whether your changes deserve change log entries in the manual.
Just one thing. \(lL)ocalnumeral
does not require the key lang=
, i.e. \localnumeral[lang=hebrew]{12}
and \localnumeral[hebrew]{12}
are both ok now. I did not see the reason to force users to type lang=
if this is the only existing key.
If you think this is a bad Idea, it could be changed back in a few key strokes, otherwise I'll add that to the manual.
Fine with me
Sure, I'll stop with the commits for the time being.
1.66 is released, so you can go ahead.
I'm don't fully understand yet the purpose of (which key should be allowed to change), so I don't feel comfortable documenting it.