search

rev2004 / cleartk

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/cleartk
0 stars 0 forks source link

remove org.cleartk.syntax.constituent.util.TreebankNode and friends #245

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Is there a reason what we create util.TreebankNode objects instead of just 
type.TreeBankNode objects? That is, why do we create plain old Java objects and 
then immediately call the convert method to make them UIMA objects rather than 
just creating UIMA objects directly?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by steven.b...@gmail.com on 21 Apr 2011 at 12:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I think when I first wrote it this way I was considering the possibility of 
using the code outside the context of UIMA.  I think it is quite safe to 
directly create the "UIMA" objects instead.

Original comment by phi...@ogren.info on 22 Apr 2011 at 2:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven.b...@gmail.com on 24 Jul 2012 at 5:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by lee.becker on 17 Feb 2013 at 5:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
FYI, I ran into something similar in cTAKES, which is why there are the 
UIMA-type trees (that follow cleartk) as well as the SimpleTree type which is 
outside of uima and is good for things like doing tree transformations for tree 
kernel learning without modifying something in the cas that may be used 
downstream.

Original comment by tim.mil...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2013 at 3:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven.b...@gmail.com on 3 May 2013 at 8:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven.b...@gmail.com on 3 May 2013 at 8:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by phi...@ogren.info on 15 Mar 2014 at 5:41