The behavior of list_range when you give n, s, and e is bizzare. It uses the step size (default 1), starts at s, and goes until either reaching e or getting to n items. It's hard to see a use for this behavior.
Meanwhile, the very useful case of spanning exactly from e to s with n items seems to be missing. (Is it somewhere else?)
The behavior of list_range when you give n, s, and e is bizzare. It uses the step size (default 1), starts at s, and goes until either reaching e or getting to n items. It's hard to see a use for this behavior.
Meanwhile, the very useful case of spanning exactly from e to s with n items seems to be missing. (Is it somewhere else?)