Renames the atuhorized spenders to managers. Shesek asked me while writing the Minsc Revault policy example if the managers were a different entity. I think it's also preferable to consistently choose managers instead of authorized spenders, as the "authorized` adjective may be confused as related to the local scope of the sentence ("in this specific case the spender is authorized") while "managers" reflects imho more the global role of the day-to-day funds managers: they can spend at anytime.
Makes tiny changes to the "protocol" to correctly handle batched spending attempts (the most notable one is the cosigner's sign where i previously assumed there was only one input to the tx).
This:
atuhorized spenders
tomanagers
. Shesek asked me while writing the Minsc Revault policy example if the managers were a different entity. I think it's also preferable to consistently choosemanagers
instead ofauthorized spenders
, as the "authorized` adjective may be confused as related to the local scope of the sentence ("in this specific case the spender is authorized") while "managers" reflects imho more the global role of the day-to-day funds managers: they can spend at anytime.sign
where i previously assumed there was only one input to the tx).