search

revault / practical-revault

Version 0 specifications for a Revault deployment
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
33 stars 9 forks source link

Gradual information deletion on the sync server #30

Closed darosior closed 4 years ago

darosior commented 4 years ago

I speak for all of us in this one, please ack (or nack if this is nonsensical).

darosior commented 4 years ago

Yeah maybe i should have done a clear separation instead of sneaking it in.

Interesting, i disagree. I think they'll outsource to people more competent to guarantee their timely operations than they are: invoices are cheaper than a dedicated tech team.

kloaec commented 4 years ago

I need to think about this a bit more. Indeed the sync server SHOULD be untrusted. It is a vector of DOS though, by itself or to the wallets I guess depending on message formats (could spam requests/notifications of signatures).

Regarding the original point: yes I suppose we can delete info regularly, no problem.

kloaec commented 4 years ago

ack a1d28e802c70da5c3d11e46a18c3b30e97c310f8