Is a invalid and signed spend request always better unvaulted ?

revault / practical-revault

Version 0 specifications for a Revault deployment

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

33 stars 9 forks source link

Is a invalid and signed spend request always better unvaulted ? #48

Closed darosior closed 3 years ago

darosior commented 4 years ago

Because of @kloaec i'm once again re-considering the flow, should we really block on a NACK by the watchtower at the second step (fully signed spend tx) ? In this case what we are going to do with it ? Try in half an hour ? Sure. Would it be the most likely scenario ? In other ones should it better be revaulted ?

darosior commented 4 years ago

I think that if we have:

Opinion: ACK
... Sign the transaction ...
Validation: NACK

We must broadcast the unvault and the cancel transaction. Now the question is more of "how to transcribe that to users ?"

darosior commented 3 years ago

Not a valid concern anymore, we don't ask for an explicit ACK anymore :)