The simulation currently is configured with a "refill period", whereas we expect stakeholders to be informed of low unallocated reserves on their WT to eventually refill it.
We should remove the REFILL_PERIOD to instead assumes that when the reserve goes low enough the operator will refill the WT, and track the refills (total number and block height).
The simulation currently is configured with a "refill period", whereas we expect stakeholders to be informed of low unallocated reserves on their WT to eventually refill it.
We should remove the
REFILL_PERIODto instead assumes that when the reserve goes low enough the operator will refill the WT, and track the refills (total number and block height).What do you think @JSwambo ?