The opacity style option was removed in #540 , in trying to factor to semantic components. However, since we don't have that yet (dependent on some larger refactorings, as discussed in #489 ) - we should bring this back.
I'd prefer to use a more semantic component like <Opacity />, however, in the current design, that can impact layout, as every primitive has an associated layout node.
The
opacitystyle option was removed in #540 , in trying to factor to semantic components. However, since we don't have that yet (dependent on some larger refactorings, as discussed in #489 ) - we should bring this back.I'd prefer to use a more semantic component like
<Opacity />, however, in the current design, that can impact layout, as every primitive has an associated layout node.