Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RD Format, rdformat)

[haya14busa]

This is an umbrella issue of Reviewdog Diagnostic Format

document and proto: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog/tree/master/proto/rdf

• [x] RFC: Reviewdog Diagnostic Format #629
  • Input format support
  • [x] Support rdjsonl as input format #674
  • [x] Support rdjson as input format #703
  • Output format support
  • [ ] Support rdjsonl as output format
  • [ ] Support rdjson as output format
  • [x] Support diagnostic level #684
  • [x] Improve parsers' RD format support (errorformat,checkstyle) #690 #694
  • [x] Use Reviewdog Diagnostic Format internally #673
  • Support multiline diagnostic output
  • [x] -reporter=github-pr-review #680
  • [x] -reporter=github-check (github-pr-check) #684
  • [ ] -reporter=gitlab-mr-discussion
  • [ ] -reporter=gerrit-change-review
  • [ ] -reporter=local (Unified reporter)
  • [x] Improve comment output format (support severity, code, source name) #700
  • [ ] Support Code Suggestion (Tracked by #678)
  • [x] partially done. supported github-pr-review
  • [x] Update README and CHANGELOG
• [ ] Create a dedicated Reviewdog Diagnostic Format repository
• [ ] Support RD format as output of https://github.com/reviewdog/errorformat
• [ ] Support conversion between RD Format and SARIF

[haya14busa]

SARIF references:

• https://github.blog/2020-10-05-announcing-third-party-code-scanning-tools-static-analysis-and-developer-security-training/

[christian-schilling]

There is also this one to look at: https://lsif.dev/