reworkd / AgentGPT

🤖 Assemble, configure, and deploy autonomous AI Agents in your browser.
https://agentgpt.reworkd.ai
GNU General Public License v3.0
31.96k stars 9.26k forks source link

RangeError [ERR_HTTP_INVALLD_STATUS_CODE]:Invalid status code:0 #81

Closed lengmo714 closed 1 year ago

lengmo714 commented 1 year ago

error - RangeError [ERR_HTTP_INVALID_STATUS_CODE]: Invalid status code: 0 at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:399:5) at ServerResponse.writeHead (node:_http_server:344:11) at ServerResponse.writeHead (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\compiled\compression\index.js:46:263) at ServerResponse._implicitHeader (node:_http_server:335:8) at ServerResponse.end (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\compiled\compression\index.js:22:749) at DevServer.runEdgeFunction (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\next-server.js:1461:41) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) at async DevServer.runApi (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\next-server.js:468:47) at async Object.fn (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\next-server.js:751:37) at async Router.execute (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\router.js:253:36) at async DevServer.run (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\base-server.js:384:29) at async DevServer.run (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\dev\next-dev-server.js:743:20) at async DevServer.handleRequest (E:\otherfile\AgentGPT\node_modules\next\dist\server\base-server.js:322:20) { code: 'ERR_HTTP_INVALID_STATUS_CODE'

18296070379 commented 1 year ago

Have you solved this problem,Can it be an agency issue?

lengmo714 commented 1 year ago

谢谢您的来信,稍会儿给您回信。

APiTJLillo commented 1 year ago

Similar to #90

asim-shrestha commented 1 year ago

Hey are you still experiencing this? @lengmo714 @18296070379

lengmo714 commented 1 year ago

谢谢您的来信,稍会儿给您回信。

asim-shrestha commented 1 year ago

Ah apologies, I initially linked an incorrect issue earlier this appears to be linked to #90. Given the discussion there is bigger, lets move our discussion there