Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I was thinking ... could this be because we do not have quiescense (where is my
dictionary :o) search? I think that is obligatory. Suppose Gray searches up to
depth
5. and in the last ply Gray captures our queen. The position is evaluated as
awesome,
and stored in the table right? But what if, in the next move, we hit Gray's
queen?
Instead of stopping at maximum depth, we should switch to continue the search
with
captures only. I think it's as easy as that. Although I would like to verify
that
*that* is really the problem here.
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2007 at 7:34
setboard r1b1k2r/pppp1ppp/2n2n2/2b1p3/4P1q1/P1NP1N1P/1PP1QPP1/R1B1KB1R b KQkq -
0 7
using minimax only GM moves away her queen. using MTDf GM gives away her queen.
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 5:04
We've abandoned MTD(f) for MiniMax. Gray Matter should no longer give away her
queen. ;-)
Original comment by brainix
on 29 Jan 2008 at 11:42
Original comment by brainix
on 29 Jan 2008 at 11:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 29 Nov 2007 at 9:38