Suggestion from Tom Petch (subject: rfc7322bis citation anchor):
I do not know if and where rfc7322bis is under discussion but I have a concern about citation anchors. RFC7322 points out that the Abstract must not include any since it is extracted and used elsewhere (albeit with a large Erratum attached).
I think that the same is needed for anything between CODE BEGINS and CODE ENDS which can include references to I-D, RFC, IANA and manufacturere websites, IEEE, ISO and BBF standards and so on, more so than the body of most documents and where any xML will wreck the code. References are vital, but citations in the sense used in rc7337bis are a disaster.
I believe that this is true for all such code but that likely needs a consensus thereto.
Suggestion from Tom Petch (subject: rfc7322bis citation anchor):
I do not know if and where rfc7322bis is under discussion but I have a concern about citation anchors. RFC7322 points out that the Abstract must not include any since it is extracted and used elsewhere (albeit with a large Erratum attached).
I think that the same is needed for anything between CODE BEGINS and CODE ENDS which can include references to I-D, RFC, IANA and manufacturere websites, IEEE, ISO and BBF standards and so on, more so than the body of most documents and where any xML will wreck the code. References are vital, but citations in the sense used in rc7337bis are a disaster.
I believe that this is true for all such code but that likely needs a consensus thereto.