Closed mnot closed 3 years ago
It seems that the intent here might have been to disallow whitespace in the pn
attribute, since the pn
attribute is used in the same ways as the anchor
attribute (but often auto-generated by tooling if the anchor
attribute was not provided in the source file). But I agree that the change should be documented.
Sounds right, also makes it slightly clearer that pn's are supposed to be unique.
The uniqueness requirement was the primary reason for the change. One of the validators I used during development actually complained about pn not being xsd:ID ,:-)
I suggest that we have consensus and this should be documented in 7991bis.
@jrlevine Shall we close this (with the understanding that 7991bis will be updated as needed)? Whatever is best for your workflow...
OK with me
pn is in the RNG but is one of the generated elements excluded from the text. See #201
The 2.32 revision of the schema changed the content of the
pn
attribute from text to anxsd:ID
. This should be documented.