About 887 early RFCs are shown with status UNKNOWN.
The policy question is whether the RPC should be requested
to reclassify these as HISTORIC by default, with a best
effort in conjunction with the various streams to identify
any alternative classifications.
This is super-low priority. For most developers, there is no essential difference between "unknown" and "historic". When the question comes up for a particular RFC, it can be dealt with then.
About 887 early RFCs are shown with status UNKNOWN.
The policy question is whether the RPC should be requested to reclassify these as HISTORIC by default, with a best effort in conjunction with the various streams to identify any alternative classifications.
Full list of Unknown: https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search_detail.php?std_trk=Any&pubstatus%5B%5D=Unknown&pub_date_type=any