rfcseries-wg / new-topics

3 stars 1 forks source link

Status UNKNOWN [Carpenter] #2

Open ekr opened 2 years ago

ekr commented 2 years ago

About 887 early RFCs are shown with status UNKNOWN.

The policy question is whether the RPC should be requested to reclassify these as HISTORIC by default, with a best effort in conjunction with the various streams to identify any alternative classifications.

Full list of Unknown: https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search_detail.php?std_trk=Any&pubstatus%5B%5D=Unknown&pub_date_type=any

paulehoffman commented 2 years ago

This is super-low priority. For most developers, there is no essential difference between "unknown" and "historic". When the question comes up for a particular RFC, it can be dealt with then.