Open JayDaley opened 1 year ago
Not a policy issue. :-)
@paulehoffman perhaps, but if the RPC and/or ED want to get a sense of the community about an issue that affects them, or a community member wants to offer a suggestion, the RSWG is a reasonable place to look. I'd suggest having a label / designation for such issues to make it clear that they're not going to turn into I-Ds and consensus positions.
An often repeated complaint about the rfc-editor.org website is that when you find the page for an RFC you are not presented with the RFC to read but only information about the RFC and the various formats available to view/download it in. The reason for that, as I understand it, is hat this is the way that academic publishing works and that it the information that is expected to be found, and nobody has been able to agree on what format should be shown alongside that when people land.
it seems as if this is reasonably easy to fix: