I have been using for a while the ScipyMinimizer interface, in specific I have been using the BFGS algorithm. Today, I migrated to the Minimizer interface, where I also used the BFGS algorithm. I found that in some scenarios both interfaces gave me different results. I have been checking the parameters, and it does not seem to be that (but I am not completely sure because finding the default ones in SciPy it does not seem to be trivial). It is expected that the behavior of both implementations to be different?
They are the same general algorithm but it is not an exact mirror. I wouldn't expect results to reproduce exactly. But there shouldn't be systematic differences between the results
Hi,
I have been using for a while the
ScipyMinimizer
interface, in specific I have been using theBFGS
algorithm. Today, I migrated to theMinimizer
interface, where I also used theBFGS
algorithm. I found that in some scenarios both interfaces gave me different results. I have been checking the parameters, and it does not seem to be that (but I am not completely sure because finding the default ones inSciPy
it does not seem to be trivial). It is expected that the behavior of both implementations to be different?Thanks,