Closed romanho closed 2 months ago
Hi, no, nothing changed. If Mallory gets read access to a part of the plaintext, I would suggest to make two independent gocryptfs filesystems:
1) For stuff that should stay secret 2) For stuff that should be shared
Another question related to the audit by Taylor Hornby, a little bit different to issue 679. Citing p.4:
Has anything changed to this? At least I didn't find anything in the issues here, but maybe I used wrong keywords...
In my planned application, an adversary would have full access to ciphertext as it's on a removable medium. And there are also cases where he can get at least read access at runtime so he's in the Mallory class mentioned in the audit.