Problem: nodes can have relays and sensors attached to them, but the current naming scheme is an xor relationship. I'm thinking we just allow the coordinator to try to actuate any other node. It'll be a no-op if it doesn't have a relay attached. Then I can remove actuation from the naming protocol.
I like the idea of being to on-the-fly actuate any node. It'll be a no-op if we send the command to a non-relay enabled node. I've removed the actuator information from the naming protocol.
Problem: nodes can have relays and sensors attached to them, but the current naming scheme is an xor relationship. I'm thinking we just allow the coordinator to try to actuate any other node. It'll be a no-op if it doesn't have a relay attached. Then I can remove actuation from the naming protocol.
What do you think @Hotblack ?