Closed Jia21 closed 3 years ago
Thank you, that's great helpful!
@joellembatchou
Apologies for being dense, but does this mean that similar to SAIGE you don't have to exclude related samples prior to analysis. I am trying to understand if that is what is meant by this sentence in the FAQ:
"we bypass having to use the GRM K and use the polygenic effect estimates X^β to control for population structure when testing variants for association."
Thank you so much, the tool has been very user friendly and the documentation is great!
Hi,
REGENIE accounts for population structure and relatedness in Step 1 through the estimation of a genome-wide polygenic effect component from the whole genome regression model. The paper includes simulation results with various amounts of relatedness present (see Extended Data Figs. 5 & 6).
Cheers, Joelle
Hi Joelle,
Thank you for providing such a valuable tool and comprehensive documentation. As a newcomer to genomics, I have a couple of questions about the GRM in REGENIE:
I've been reading about the GCTA literature (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011) recently. Are there any similarities or commonalities between GCTA and REGENIE in terms of their approaches to variance equation (introduction Equation 2, they use a similar format like FAQ-general)?
You mentioned that "REGENIE accounts for relatedness in Step 1 from the whole genome regression model". As I know that REGENIE estimates parameters block by block, could this approach potentially impact the estimation of a genome-wide polygenic effect?
Thank you in advance for your time and expertise. I appreciate your assistance.
Amber
Hi Amber,
Cheers, Joelle
Dear REGENIE team,
I am wondering whether REGENIE could handle the GRM or kinship matrix problem. As I read the paper of REGENIE, the formula did consider the genetic relatedness matrix. But in the REGENIE input, we actually don't need to pre-calculate GRM or kinship matrix and input the kinship matrix or GRM, therefore I am wondering RENEGIE could handle this problem inside of the algorithm.
Thanks a lot! Elaine