Closed ghost closed 4 years ago
Thanks!
Can you elaborate on the 'right' key to force a callback?
And change the button texts to "Overwrite" and "Cancel"?
I know i've argued against more dialogs before, but maybe it's better to always have a confirmation dialog?
Can you elaborate on the 'right' key to force a callback?
Imagine the following: You want to save a file but the fuzzy matching interferes and you can only select an already existing file with a similar name. However you want to save your current file as the name you chose.
Example:
There is a file called
foo
and you want to save your current file asfo
If you press ENTER then you will get a prompt to overwrite the file but you don't want that. So to force the current file being saved asfo
you invoke the callback by pressing RIGHT.
Not sure I understand the need for always having a confirmation dialog, could you explain further? Do note that "Cancel" is the default selection, making it impossible to accidentally overwrite files. That decision has to be made conciously.
Ah right, i remember ...
There is a file called foo and you want to save your current file as fo I think this was one of the problems why i disabled "save as" back then.
This can be hard to discover for a user. What about having a message box with
[Save as fo] [Overwrite foo] [Cancel]
This also what i meant with the confirmation dialog, maybe there should always be a confirmation.
This can be hard to discover for a user.
Hmm true, always got to assume the worst. There is the statusbar description but we have to assume no one reads that either.
I'll look into adding it as another choice to the dialog.
This is a first draft of using the dialog instead of a keybind for saving with a custom name.
Things to consider
Let me know what you think.
I played with this and i think a better solution could be to insert the user_input
into the current list (and then have a confirmation dialog). Not sure how easy or difficult to do (and don't remember if we discussed this solution before).
I tried to get something working last night but i think the key problem is that "save as" by default works by giving you name and then typically the user adds a _ver2
or backup
to it. Not sure whether this is possible right now with Textredux.`
Do you have the code from your experiments somewhere for me to look at?
How do you want to proceed with this if your latest idea is not feasible?
I tried starting from the M.select_file
but didn't get very far. I'm not sure how to proceed. With save_as
it's crucial that it doesn't behave in any way unexpectedly for a user, as they might lose data ...
I actually like the solution you proposed first with the dialog. It's pretty safe too because the "dangerous" options have to be explicitly selected.
OTOH I think adding the user input to the list is hard to implement and not very intuitive or safe.
Ok, then let's try to sort this out! Maybe one still needs to consider the "on_new_selection" callback separately.
Do you have something specific in mind?
As I see it the current behavior is acceptable. The button being empty if there is no user input is admittedly not very nice though. Button now only shows up when the user entered something.
Ah, i hadn't got a notification (edits probably don't trigger this) - this looks promising!
One issue:
if you have a folder foo
, you can't save a file as fo
because it will switch into foo on enter.
That's a direct cause of abandoning the keybind.
There is no way of knowing if the user wants to enter the folder or save as the current filename. The keybind from the original solution sidesteps that by always invoking the callback.
I do like the current version with the dialog but I see no good way to work around that issue.
OTOH I do think that TR would greatly benefit from having a "native" save_as function. I've been using it for so long now that I'll never go back to the GUI version. Not sure how to resolve this though.
Not working for TA11 in its current state.