At the moment there is a @supresswarnings in Logger that can lead to ugly
trouble. This really needs more type-safety (since I already fall for it).
When you say:
Logger<C,L> log = Logger.get("foo");
there is no guarantee that the name "foo" is attached to something of the
type Logger<C,L>. The problem, of course, is that generics aren't reified
in Java. I'm not sure what's a good solution.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by radugrig...@gmail.com on 26 Aug 2009 at 4:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
radugrig...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2009 at 4:44