search

rgst-io / stencil

📒 A modern living-template engine for evolving repositories
https://stencil.rgst.io
Apache License 2.0
4 stars 1 forks source link

docs: add stub framework #31

Closed jaredallard closed 3 months ago

jaredallard commented 3 months ago

Adds a framework for documentation writing based off of the mise^1 documentation framework, which I like a lot. Essentially, we are using vitepress^2 which is just markdown files with some extra features.

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 50.52%. Comparing base (48624ce) to head (de137e8).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #31 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 50.52% 50.52% ======================================= Files 40 40 Lines 1700 1700 ======================================= Hits 859 859 Misses 703 703 Partials 138 138 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

jaredallard commented 3 months ago

I've been combining the build+release tasks since it's almost entirely a c/p, and using if statements for the build, but that's just a nit idea. But everything else looks good.

I was thinking about that as well

AaronM04 commented 3 months ago

@deregtd you might want to consider a closer look at this PR given that the author is implicated in the XZ backdoor stuff: https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor

jaredallard commented 3 months ago

@deregtd you might want to consider a closer look at this PR given that the author is implicated in the XZ backdoor stuff: boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor

For the record, I've replied on that original PR: https://github.com/jamespfennell/xz/pull/2#issuecomment-2027836356

AaronM04 commented 3 months ago

@deregtd you might want to consider a closer look at this PR given that the author is implicated in the XZ backdoor stuff: boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor

For the record, I've replied on that original PR: jamespfennell/xz#2 (comment)

OK so it seems like you innocently picked the latest version of xz there. It was unfortunate timing that you did that in between the backdoor release and its discovery. Sorry about the "implicated" label...