Closed 3flex closed 6 years ago
Added notes to correct a couple of minor issues I just noticed. I'll fix them when incorporating any feedback people have.
Finally getting around to finishing this off. I haven't pushed my changes yet, but I've rebased on master and also I've addressed the feedback with the exception of a couple of things that I've mentioned in replies to the original review feedback. Once those are fixed up I'll push a new update for review.
Updated with feedback taken into account; let me know if there's anything further that needs addressing.
@rharter just noticed you released a new version a few days ago without merging this PR - any feedback you'd like me to address?
@rharter sorry to bother you - just wondering if you have further thoughts or feedback on this PR? If I have to rebase again I probably wouldn't go through the trouble, so if you think there's value here it'd be best to merge before other changes go in.
If not feel free to close, cheers.
Sorry for letting this drop off my radar, @3flex. Thanks for the contribution!
Closes #18.
The code generated by the
createFieldNamingMethods()
method is taken from the Gson project, so not sure how to attribute this to them; it was derived from their code but is now generated with JavaPoet. I left their license header onFieldNamingTest.java
because that only has slight modifications from the code taken from their project.This will require projects using auto-value-gson to have a runtime dependency on Gson 2.8.4+ going forward.