Closed MRezaNasirloo closed 5 years ago
@illarionov it looks like you had a fix for this in 9740916. Would you be interested in PR-ing it, or if I crafted a PR out of it?
@ZacSweers I'd rather you do it since you have more experience with this project's code
Will do!
After talking with @rharter, we're just going to remove this API instead. See #199
I have a custom
TypeAdapter<String>
which is responsible for parsing an object and return a string value, looks like the processor uses the default String type adapter for this field.Model class:
My custom TypeAdapter:
Generated class with 0.7.0
Generated with 0.6.0