Closed dennis-tseng99 closed 1 year ago
There's plenty of folks building 32-bit ones.
@julian-klode Thanks for your comment. I added a compiled flag(ARCH_INDEPEND) in Makefile, shim.h, shim.c and fallback.c to let user make his/her final decision.
I think what we could do is try arch specific first and then the independent ones. But also I'd prefer not to have arch-independent shim binary named out there.
The moment you do it, product managers will appear and request an installer image that runs on both amd64 and arm64.😜
I think what we could do is try arch specific first and then the independent ones. But also I'd prefer not to have arch-independent shim binary named out there.
The moment you do it, product managers will appear and request an installer image that runs on both amd64 and arm64.stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye
Agreed - this is a really bad mistake IMHO.
I think we're going to close this as we don't want this as there's lots of opposition here.
Since we only build the 64-bit binaries, we don't have the issue of the mixed architecture binaries in the same directory. Besides, we will use the same install script for x86_64 and AArch64. It's easier to maintain the script with the same names.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lin glin@suse.com Signed-off-by: Dennis Tseng dennis.tseng@suse.com