Closed gs202 closed 5 years ago
Merging #107 into master will decrease coverage by
0.19%
. The diff coverage is92.85%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #107 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 95.08% 94.89% -0.2%
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 224 235 +11
=========================================
+ Hits 213 223 +10
- Misses 11 12 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pytest_jira.py | 94.89% <92.85%> (-0.2%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8123759...014b2c8. Read the comment docs.
Thank you for your contribution, it looks like that
pydantic
lib is not really available for py3.5.I don't like idea of loosing compatibility with supported version of python. You might consider to restrict this feature to be enabled only for
>py3.5
... or something like that.
Will work on that
Adding option to return jira issue model (with metadata) instead of boolean result (
--jira-return-issue
) issue #94 The issue type that will be returned isJiraIssue
model using pydantic, with currently the MVP fields.Using jira (https://pypi.org/project/jira/) will require changing the connection method, also the returned fields (metadata) has nothing more than when using request call - so i thought it will not add any value.