Closed gs202 closed 5 years ago
Merging #108 into master will increase coverage by
0.18%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #108 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.08% 95.27% +0.18%
==========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 224 233 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 213 222 +9
Misses 11 11
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pytest_jira.py | 95.27% <100%> (+0.18%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8123759...2879690. Read the comment docs.
Adding option to return Jira issue model (with metadata) instead of boolean result (--jira-return-metadata) issue #94 The issue type that will be returned is JiraIssue model using marshmallow (as pydantic is backport for python 3.6), with currently the MVP fields (and can be easily expanded).
Using jira (https://pypi.org/project/jira/) will require changing the connection method, also the returned fields (metadata) has nothing more than when using request call - so i thought it will not add any value.