I believe it's more logical to put the "Exposing apps using a Route" module before "Exposing apps using MetalLB" due to a dependenci, the MetalLB module reads somewhere: If you completed the Exposing apps using a Route module, the VM is currently accessible from inside the cluster using the Service previously created. so participant really need to run most of the "Exposing apps using a Route" module to complete the MetalLB module.
I never changed module order before, hopefully that's the right way to do it. I did build a Dockerfile and deployed the new workshop content, it looked good to me, attached a picture.
I believe it's more logical to put the "Exposing apps using a Route" module before "Exposing apps using MetalLB" due to a dependenci, the MetalLB module reads somewhere: If you completed the Exposing apps using a Route module, the VM is currently accessible from inside the cluster using the Service previously created. so participant really need to run most of the "Exposing apps using a Route" module to complete the MetalLB module.
I never changed module order before, hopefully that's the right way to do it. I did build a Dockerfile and deployed the new workshop content, it looked good to me, attached a picture.