Open strogonoff opened 5 years ago
@strogonoff it sounds like you need a specification to describe this 👍
Here are examples of our own specifications:
Was thinking along the same lines. I expect implementing Metanorma-based build for specs in Open Project framework would also uncover a few ways to improve how software docs are treated.
On Aug 3, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Ronald Tse notifications@github.com wrote:
@strogonoff https://github.com/strogonoff it sounds like you need a specification to describe this 👍
Here are examples of our own specifications:
https://github.com/riboseinc/nereon-syntax https://github.com/riboseinc/nereon-syntax https://github.com/riboseinc/ros-encrypted-tokens https://github.com/riboseinc/ros-encrypted-tokens — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/riboseinc/jekyll-theme-open-project/issues/24#issuecomment-410100548, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR4X80asRyUwDLTTO8alqN3dweZQ1Aiks5uM43TgaJpZM4VsrMd.
Indeed! We do want to improve Metanorma for various use cases.
Open Project framework has very simple requirements for a set of software documentation. This specification should be included in the docs. Drafting it here: