Open riccardoperra opened 9 months ago
Latest commit: dd119a654b579ff70862be4fa96817694de63cc3
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
Deploy preview for codeimage-highlight-dev ready!
✅ Preview https://codeimage-highlight-q33ixp8fu-riccardo-perras-projects.vercel.app https://codeimage-highlight-pr-617.vercel.app
Built with commit dd119a654b579ff70862be4fa96817694de63cc3. This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action
Deploy preview for codeimage-website-dev ready!
✅ Preview https://codeimage-website-nxvyrrhvg-riccardo-perras-projects.vercel.app https://codeimage-website-pr-617.vercel.app
Built with commit dd119a654b579ff70862be4fa96817694de63cc3. This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action
Deploy preview for codeimage ready!
✅ Preview https://codeimage-boykd9oja-riccardo-perras-projects.vercel.app https://codeimage-app-pr-617.vercel.app
Built with commit dd119a654b579ff70862be4fa96817694de63cc3. This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@gooroodev review please
Appreciate your call, @oleksandr-vonahi!
🐞Mistake | 🤪Typo | 🚨Security | 🚀Performance | 💪Best Practices | 📖Readability | ❓Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
DiffCheckbox
and DiffCheckboxMarker
components for marking lines as added, removed, or untouched.StateField
and StateEffect
.customEffectAnnotation
for custom transaction annotations.git-patch
.diffMarkerControl
and diffMarkerStateIconGutter
extensions for diff mode.EditorState
to include metadata for diff lines.EditorStyleForm
to include a checkbox for toggling diff mode.PreviewExportEditor
to handle syncing transactions.PreviewExportEditor
.ID | Type | Details | Severity | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 🐞Mistake | Potential memory leak in DiffCheckboxMarker due to untracked disposal |
🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
2 | 🐞Mistake | Unnecessary state updates in CanvasEditor |
🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
3 | 🚀Performance | Inefficient transaction handling in PreviewExportEditor |
🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
4 | 💪Best Practices | Magic strings used for annotation events | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
5 | 💪Best Practices | Hardcoded colors in styles | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
6 | 📖Readability | Lack of comments explaining complex logic | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
7 | 📖Readability | Long function bodies without clear separation of concerns | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
8 | 📖Readability | Inconsistent naming conventions | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
DiffCheckboxMarker
due to untracked disposalDetails: The dispose
function in DiffCheckboxMarker
is not guaranteed to be called, leading to potential memory leaks.
Fix:
import { onCleanup } from 'solid-js';
// Inside DiffCheckboxMarker class
toDOM(view: EditorView): Node {
return createRoot(dispose => {
this.dispose = dispose;
onCleanup(() => this.dispose?.());
const [value, setValue] = createSignal<DiffCheckboxState>('untouched');
const unsubscribe = diffPluginEvents.on('syncLine', ({state, line}) => {
if (line.number === this.lineNumber) {
setValue(state ?? 'untouched');
}
});
onCleanup(() => unsubscribe());
return (
<div class={container}>
<DiffCheckbox
value={value()}
onChange={state =>
dispatchUpdateDiffLineState(view, this.lineNumber, state)
}
/>
</div>
);
}) as Node;
}
Explanation: Added onCleanup
to ensure the dispose
function is called when the component is destroyed.
CanvasEditor
Details: The createEffect
in CanvasEditor
updates the state even when there are no changes.
Fix:
createEffect(
on(
() => editorState.options.focused,
isFocused => {
if (view && !view.hasFocus && isFocused) {
editorSetFocused(true);
}
},
{ defer: true },
),
);
Explanation: Added { defer: true }
to the on
function to defer the effect until necessary.
PreviewExportEditor
Details: Transactions are handled individually, leading to performance issues.
Fix:
let unsubscribe: VoidFunction;
createEffect(
on(editorView, editorView => {
if (unsubscribe) unsubscribe();
if (!editorView) return;
transactions.value().forEach(transaction => {
sync(transaction, editorView);
transactions.setValue(trs => trs.filter(tr => tr !== transaction));
});
unsubscribe = transactions.listen(({ event: transaction, remove }) => {
sync(transaction, editorView);
remove();
});
}),
);
Explanation: Batched transaction handling to improve performance.
Details: Magic strings are used for annotation events, which can lead to errors.
Fix:
const INIT_METADATA_ANNOTATION_EVENT = 'init-metadata';
Explanation: Defined a constant for the annotation event to avoid magic strings.
Details: Colors are hardcoded in styles, making them difficult to maintain.
Fix:
import { themeTokens } from '@codeui/kit';
export const colors = {
removeLine: themeTokens.colors.red[500],
removeToken: themeTokens.colors.red[700],
addLine: themeTokens.colors.green[500],
addToken: themeTokens.colors.green[700],
};
Explanation: Used theme tokens for colors to improve maintainability.
Details: Complex logic is not explained with comments, making it difficult to understand.
Fix: Add comments explaining the logic in complex functions.
Details: Long function bodies make it difficult to understand the code.
Fix: Refactor long functions into smaller, more manageable functions.
Details: Naming conventions are inconsistent, leading to confusion.
Fix: Standardize naming conventions across the codebase.
The code introduces a significant new feature with diff mode and handles state management and UI updates effectively. However, there are some areas where best practices and readability can be improved. Specifically, the code can benefit from better separation of concerns, more consistent naming conventions, and avoiding magic strings. Additionally, performance improvements can be made by batching transaction handling. Overall, the code quality is good, but addressing the identified issues will make it more maintainable and performant.
-- I only arrive when I am mentioned and asked to review the pull request. Your thoughts matter! Please react or reply.
Review or Edit in CodeSandbox
Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders
Open Preview