Closed jwreep closed 5 months ago
I'm not a huge fan of the latter option mostly because it would be inconsistent to separate data from the same file into differently named properties, but I see what you mean about the naming convention being a bit awkward. You could separate out the namespace by equation, ie something like _trm.momentum.gravity
. It would be easy enough to build some simple data classes that could be built for the trm data that would do just that.
That seems like a more reasonable solution than what I proposed.
I was considering filling out the rest of the
_trm_data
property inpydrad.parse
. (Currently need enthalpy fluxes.) It seems that it might make sense to split the property into one for each of the four equations being parsed.It seems there might be a bit of awkward variable naming otherwise. For example, there's a gravity term in both the momentum and hydrogen energy equations. They could perhaps be named
_trm_data.gravitational_momentum
and_trm_data.gravitational_energy
, but it might be more clear to have instead_momentum_trm_data.gravity
and_H_energy_trm_data.gravity
or similar.Any thoughts?