In the current setup, you can either use the power-law radiative losses or non-equilibrium radiation, but not both. This makes sense except when one wants to solve for the non-equilibrium populations and decouple this calculation from the hydro code (i.e. not fold these back into the radiative loss calculation).
Need to modify the if-else statement in the radiation config template to account for this option. Also need to double check the actual HYDRAD code to make sure that setting non-equilibrium radiation flat does not automatically imply that these will be folded back into the radiative losses.
Also, the spelling of the decoupling flag is incorrect in pydrad w.r.t. the actual code. I'm setting DECOUPLE_IONIZATION_STATE_SOLVER, but HYDRAD is looking for DECOUPLE_IONISATION_STATE_SOLVER.
In the current setup, you can either use the power-law radiative losses or non-equilibrium radiation, but not both. This makes sense except when one wants to solve for the non-equilibrium populations and decouple this calculation from the hydro code (i.e. not fold these back into the radiative loss calculation).
Need to modify the
if-else
statement in the radiation config template to account for this option. Also need to double check the actual HYDRAD code to make sure that setting non-equilibrium radiation flat does not automatically imply that these will be folded back into the radiative losses.Also, should resolve this after or alongside #95