Open vipulnaik opened 3 years ago
This seems fine, but I am wondering what most people would get out of learning this information about an org. I can see some productivity-obsessed people caring about such details, but I think most people care more about less granular details, like the ratio of text to face-to-face communication, or ratio of asynchronous to synchronous communication. These things give a feel for how the org operates without spending time on "irrelevant" details (but they are also harder to find).
I think this also depends on the possibility to find enough information about the tools being used by orgs. But also, if tools are replaced by others at some pace we can't track, I don't know how useful this endeavor would be.
I'm thinking of a table with columns (this could be OrgWatch-only):
@riceissa and @sebastiansanchez123, what do you guys think?